HTTP pipelining:修订间差异

来自WHY42
Riguz留言 | 贡献
无编辑摘要
Riguz留言 | 贡献
无编辑摘要
 
(未显示同一用户的9个中间版本)
第1行: 第1行:
HTTP pipelining is a feature of HTTP/1.1, which allows multiple HTTP requests to be sent over a single TCP connection without waiting for the corresponding responses.
HTTP pipelining is a feature of HTTP/1.1, which allows multiple HTTP requests to be sent over a single TCP connection without waiting for the corresponding responses.


HTTP/1.1 requires servers to respond to pipelined requests correctly, with non-pipelined but valid responses even if server does not support HTTP pipelining. Despite this requirement, many legacy [HTTP/1.1] servers do not support pipelining correctly, forcing most HTTP clients to not use HTTP pipelining.
HTTP/1.1 requires servers to respond to pipelined requests correctly, with non-pipelined but valid responses even if server does not support HTTP pipelining. Despite this requirement, '''many legacy [[HTTP/1.1]] servers do not support pipelining correctly, forcing most HTTP clients to not use HTTP pipelining'''.


The technique was superseded by multiplexing via [HTTP/2], which is supported by most modern browsers.
The technique was superseded by '''multiplexing''' via [[HTTP/2]], which is supported by most modern browsers.
 
In [[HTTP/3]], multiplexing is accomplished via [[QUIC]] which replaces [[TCP]]. This further reduces loading time, as there is no [[Head-of-line blocking]] even if some packets are lost.
 
[[Image:Bonus1_H1_pipelining.png|600px|border]]
 
Crucially however, this pipelining only applies to the requests from the browser. As the HTTP/1.1 specification says:
 
‎<blockquote>A server MUST send its responses to those [pipelined] requests in the same order that the requests were received.</blockquote>
 
As such, we see that actual multiplexing of response chunks is still not possible with HTTP/1.1 pipelining. Put differently: pipelining solves HOL blocking for requests, but not for responses. Sadly, it’s arguably the response HOL blocking that causes the most issues for Web performance.
<ref>https://calendar.perfplanet.com/2020/head-of-line-blocking-in-quic-and-http-3-the-details/</ref>


In [HTTP/3], multiplexing is accomplished via [QUIC] which replaces [TCP]. This further reduces loading time, as there is no head-of-line blocking even if some packets are lost.


[[Category:Network]]
[[Category:Network]]

2023年12月8日 (五) 07:21的最新版本

HTTP pipelining is a feature of HTTP/1.1, which allows multiple HTTP requests to be sent over a single TCP connection without waiting for the corresponding responses.

HTTP/1.1 requires servers to respond to pipelined requests correctly, with non-pipelined but valid responses even if server does not support HTTP pipelining. Despite this requirement, many legacy HTTP/1.1 servers do not support pipelining correctly, forcing most HTTP clients to not use HTTP pipelining.

The technique was superseded by multiplexing via HTTP/2, which is supported by most modern browsers.

In HTTP/3, multiplexing is accomplished via QUIC which replaces TCP. This further reduces loading time, as there is no Head-of-line blocking even if some packets are lost.

Crucially however, this pipelining only applies to the requests from the browser. As the HTTP/1.1 specification says:

A server MUST send its responses to those [pipelined] requests in the same order that the requests were received.

As such, we see that actual multiplexing of response chunks is still not possible with HTTP/1.1 pipelining. Put differently: pipelining solves HOL blocking for requests, but not for responses. Sadly, it’s arguably the response HOL blocking that causes the most issues for Web performance. [1]